Most large spreadsheets have dozens or even hundreds of errors.
Panko & Ordway (2005)
Spreadsheets are often hard, if not impossible, to understand.
Mireault & Gresham (2015)
A significant proportion of spreadsheets have severe quality problems.
Ayalew (2007)
Errors in spreadsheets... result in incorrect decisions being made and significant losses incurred.
Beaman, et al (2005)
Despite overwhelming and unanimous evidence... companies have continued to ignore spreadsheet error risks.
Panko (2014)
Research on spreadsheet errors is substantial, compelling, and unanimous.
Panko (2015)
94% of the 88 spreadsheets audited in 7 studies have contained errors.
Panko (2008)
Every study that has looked for errors has found them... in considerable abundance.
Panko & Halverson (1996)
Spreadsheet shortcomings can significantly hamper an organization's business operation.
Reschenhofer & Matthes (2015)
Spreadsheets are dangerous to their authors and others.
Durusau & Hunting (2015)
Spreadsheets are alarmingly error-prone to write.
Paine (2001)
Spreadsheets are easy to use and very hard to check.
Chen & Chan (2000)
Most executives do not really check or verify the accuracy or validity of [their] spreadsheets...
Teo & Tan (1999)
Spreadsheets contain errors at an alarmingly high rate.
Abraham, et al (2005)
Spreadsheet errors are still the rule rather than the exception.
Nixon & O'Hara (2010)
Spreadsheet development must embrace extensive testing in order to be taken seriously as a profession.
Bock (2016)
Spreadsheets are the most popular live programming environments, but they are also notoriously fault-prone.
Hermans & van der Storm (2015)
Never assume a spreadsheet is right, even your own.
Raffensperger (2001)
Spreadsheets are more fault-prone than other software.
Kulesz & Ostberg (2013)
Spreadsheets have a notoriously high number of faults.
Rust, et al (2006)
Studies have shown that there is a high incidence of errors in spreadsheets.
Csernoch & Biro (2013)
Programmers exhibit unwarranted confidence in the correctness of their spreadsheets.
Krishna, et al (2001)
It is now widely accepted that errors in spreadsheets are both common and potentially dangerous.
Nixon & O'Hara (2010)
Your spreadsheets may be disasters in the making.
Caulkins, Morrison, & Weidemann (2006)
The issue is not whether there is an error but how many errors there are and how serious they are.
Panko (2007)
Spreadsheet errors... a great, often unrecognised, risk to corporate decision making & financial integrity.
Chadwick (2002)
Even obvious, elementary errors in very simple, clearly documented spreadsheets are... difficult to find.
Galletta, et al (1993)
It is irrational to expect large error-free spreadsheets.
Panko (2013)
A lot of decisions are being made on the basis of some bad numbers.
Ross (1996)
Spreadsheet errors have resulted in huge financial losses.
Abraham & Erwig (2007)
...few incidents of spreadsheet errors are made public and these are usually not revealed by choice.
Kruck & Sheetz (2001)
Spreadsheets are notoriously error-prone.
Cunha, et al (2011)
The quality and reliability of spreadsheets is known to be poor.
Bishop & McDaid (2007)
Untested spreadsheets are riddled with errors.
Miller (2005)
Overconfidence is one of the most substantial causes of spreadsheet errors.
Sakal, et al (2015)
The untested spreadsheet is as dangerous and untrustworthy as an untested program.
Price (2006)
The software that end users are creating... is riddled with errors.
Burnett & Myers (2014)
People tend to believe their spreadsheets are more accurate than they really are.
Caulkins, Morrison, & Weidemann (2006)
Errors in spreadsheets are as ubiquitous as spreadsheets themselves.
Colbenz (2005)
Spreadsheets are commonly used and commonly flawed.
Caulkins, Morrison, & Weidemann (2008)
Spreadsheets are extraordinarily and unacceptably prone to error.
Dunn (2010)
Every study, without exception, has found error rates much higher than organizations would wish to tolerate.
Panko (1999)
Developing an error-free spreadsheet has been a problem since the beginning of end-user computing.
Mireault (2015)
1% of all formulas in operational spreadsheets are in error.
Powell, Baker, & Lawson (2009)
Despite being staggeringly error prone, spreadsheets are a highly flexible programming environment.
Abreu, et al (2015)
The results given by spreadsheets are often just wrong.
Sajaniemi (1998)
Spreadsheets can be viewed as a highly flexible programming environment for end users.
Abreu, et al (2015)
Spreadsheet errors are pervasive, stubborn, ubiquitous and complex.
Irons (2003)
Spreadsheets... pose a greater threat to your business than almost anything you can imagine.
Howard (2005)
60% of large companies feel 'Spreadsheet Hell' describes their reliance on spreadsheets.
Murphy (2007)

i spreadsheet testing methodology: Immunity

In this series of articles we introduce the i methodology for testing spreadsheets.

The i spreadsheet testing methodology is a set of guidelines for validating that a spreadsheet does what it is intended to do and ensuring that it will continue to do so.

The i methodology consists of five components:

  • Intent.
  • Instructions.
  • Instruments.
  • Implementation.
  • Immunity.

Read more: i spreadsheet testing methodology: Immunity

i spreadsheet testing methodology: Implementation

In this series of articles we introduce the i methodology for testing spreadsheets.

The i spreadsheet testing methodology is a set of guidelines for validating that a spreadsheet does what it is intended to do and ensuring that it will continue to do so.

The i methodology consists of five components:

  • Intent.
  • Instructions.
  • Instruments.
  • Implementation.
  • Immunity.

Read more: i spreadsheet testing methodology: Implementation

i spreadsheet testing methodology: Instruments

In this series of articles we introduce the i methodology for testing spreadsheets.

The i spreadsheet testing methodology is a set of guidelines for validating that a spreadsheet does what it is intended to do and ensuring that it will continue to do so.

The i methodology consists of five components:

  • Intent.
  • Instructions.
  • Instruments.
  • Implementation.
  • Immunity.

Read more: i spreadsheet testing methodology: Instruments

i spreadsheet testing methodology: Instructions

In this series of articles we introduce the i methodology for testing spreadsheets.

The i spreadsheet testing methodology is a set of guidelines for validating that a spreadsheet does what it is intended to do and ensuring that it will continue to do so.

The i methodology consists of five components:

  • Intent.
  • Instructions.
  • Instruments.
  • Implementation.
  • Immunity.

Read more: i spreadsheet testing methodology: Instructions

i spreadsheet testing methodology: Intent

In this series of articles we introduce the i methodology for testing spreadsheets.

The i spreadsheet testing methodology is a set of guidelines for validating that a spreadsheet does what it is intended to do and ensuring that it will continue to do so.

The i methodology consists of five components:

  • Intent.
  • Instructions.
  • Instruments.
  • Implementation.
  • Immunity.

Read more: i spreadsheet testing methodology: Intent

i spreadsheet testing methodology: Overview

In this series of articles we introduce the i methodology for testing spreadsheets.

The i spreadsheet testing methodology is a set of guidelines for validating that a spreadsheet does what it is intended to do and ensuring that it will continue to do so.

The i methodology consists of five components:

  • Intent.
  • Instructions.
  • Instruments.
  • Implementation.
  • Immunity.

Read more: i spreadsheet testing methodology: Overview

Go to top